FILTER CUT POINT
DETERMINATION
- a new high
precision method
| Unique super-sonic method of calibrating filters |
![]() |
|
| Wide calibration range - from 5 to 1000mm | ||
| Filter cut points traceable to NIST & NPL | ||
| Glass microspheres give unambiguous results | ||
| Accurate to 1mm for the smaller filter apertures | ||
| Maximum pore size can easily be verified |
|
A Novel Sonic Sifting Approach A Calibration graph supplied with each standard is then used to relate the percentage passing to the filter cut point. Because the particle size distributions are so narrow, a 10% weight difference passing a filter only equates to a 2mm change in pore size. The graphs below show the construction and use of the filter calibration graphs.
Certifying the Standards |
|
Requirements |
|
Turnaround time < 1week |
|||||
|
|
|||||
| Prices | |||||
|
Pore Sizes (mm) |
|||||
| 1000 - 25 | 25 - 5 | ||||
| Sonic Challenge (dry) | Ultrasonic (wet) | ||||
| £ GBP |
€ EURO* |
$ USD* |
£ GBP |
€ EURO* |
$ USD* |
| 150 | 230 | 300 | 200 | 305 | 405 |
| The following discounted price is available for sending 10+ samples in a single order | |||||
| 115 | 160 | 225 | 175 | 265 | 345 |
* Currency conversions are provided as a guide only and are therefore subject to slight fluctuation
|
PORE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS |
| Procedure |
|
Sand screens are Challenge Tested using the sonic method to provide a cut point. From the cut point a projected maximum pore size can be calculated. This has been shown to be approximately 10% above the cut point. To measure Pore Size Distributions, the mesh from the challenge test is inverted and gently tapped to remove oversize calibration microspheres. The mesh is then returned to the sonic sifter in the inverted position to remove the ‘near mesh’ microspheres trapped in the body of the sand screen. The near mesh particles are collected and analysed by microscopy and image analysis. The sizes at 3%, 50% and 97% of the cumulative distribution are noted and ascribed to the minimum pore size (P3), Average pore size (P50) and Maximum pore size (P97) respectively. The absolute minimum and maximum bead sizes reflect the single smallest and largest pore detected but the results are not as statistically robust as the P3 and P97 values and therefore not as reliable. Notes: The maximum pore sizes obtained from the cut point and from the ‘near mesh’ analysis should be within 10%. If P97 is more than 10% above the projected maximum, there are likely to be larger internal pores that do not penetrate the structure. |
| Prices |
| Cut Point price plus an additional £200 € 305* $ 405* |
* Currency conversions are provided as a guide only and are therefore subject to slight fluctuation